Home | Dr. Wright | Subscribe to Nutrition & Healing | Archives | Health e-Tips | Health Forum
start WP import block

Today's forecast: Cloudy judgment
The FDA's new "strict" advisory committee financial interest rules still leave the door wide open for significantly clouded judgment in its members.

I suppose we should be glad that the FDA recognized that it needed to change the way its advisory committees are set up at all. But the actual amendments they implemented seem more like a halfhearted attempt to appease the increasingly angry and suspicious public than they are about real change.

Last month, the agency announced that they would be imposing stricter limits on financial ties that members of its advisory committees may have with the companies involved in the decisions being made at the committee meetings. Apparently, they think capping the financial interest at $50,000 meets that "strict" criteria. According to the article I read, "If an advisor's personal financial interest is greater than $50,000, he or she won't be allowed to participate in the meeting. If the financial interest is less than $50,000, the FDA may grant a waiver…"

I don't know about you, but if I had $50,000 at stake in something, my judgment might be a bit clouded. But, then again, for a profit-mongering organization like the FDA, 50 grand is little more than pocket change, so it makes sense that they wouldn't see that level of potential profit as a conflict of interest.

Or maybe -- and this is the thought that still sends shivers down my spine -- they just don't care.

Source:
"FDA introduces new advisory committee rules," HealthDay (www.healthday.com), 8/5/08

end WP import block

Privacy Policy




Health Disclaimer!  The information provided on this site should not be construed as personal medical advice or instruction. No action should be taken based solely on the contents of this site. Readers should consult appropriate health professionals on any matter relating to their health and well-being. The information and opinions provided here are believed to be accurate and sound, based on the best judgment available to the authors, but readers who fail to consult appropriate health authorities assume the risk of any injuries. The publisher is not responsible for errors or omissions. © 1994-2009 Healthier News LLC.